They help us to understand the phenomena that make us so different as a species from other animals — that is, our artworks and cultures — and they help us to contextualize our political and social environments within broader timeframes of history. To study ourselves, as humans, is the mission of the humanities subjects in all their diverse breadths.
I believe in open access for the humanities, though, because a fundamental question should move us: what good is research on the human, if our fellow humans cannot afford to read that work? Volume 43 , Issue 5. If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered, and you may need to create a new Wiley Online Library account. If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username. Special Section Free Access.
Search for more papers by this author. Tools Request permission Export citation Add to favorites Track citation. Share Give access Share full text access. Share full text access.
Open Access and the Humanities: An Interview with Dr. Martin Paul Eve
Please review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article. Progress, Nonetheless Despite the aforementioned challenges, open access in the humanities continues to grow. What Are the Humanities For? Resources Mentioned in the Article. February 14, Budapest Open Access Initiative. Retrieved from www.
- Literature Against Criticism!
- ISBN 13: 9781107097896?
Google Scholar. Crossref Google Scholar. References Related Information. Close Figure Viewer.
Browse All Figures Return to Figure. Previous Figure Next Figure. Email or Customer ID. Forgot password? Old Password. New Password. Password Changed Successfully Your password has been changed. Presses in short, still matter.
- Social Defense: Social Change!
- Procurement Systems: A Guide to Best Practice in Construction.
- Book Review: Open Access and the Humanities » [email protected]?
- Navigation menu!
- The death of Tarpons;
- Access to Information at Virginia Tech!
Before proceeding any further, some caveats from me. I know Eve or Martin as I prefer to address him as.
I support the Open Library of Humanities, an open access publication platform Eve founded with Caroline Edwards, and am directly involved in two Open Access journals. I champion the benefits to scholarship of open data, open archives, open software, and open research practice. I have been employed as an OA champion in a Higher Education setting.
Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future
I have written with Martin Collins et al, on the topic of OA. And I work for an institution that is both experimenting with future directions for academic publishing and believes that publicly funded research should be free to the public at point of access. Open Access and the Humanities proceeds in five parts. Key areas of debate and controversy are also covered, including lengthy and fair treatment of arguments against OA that have emerged from academics in particular humanities academics. Chapter Three examines open licensing, beginning with what open licensing is and the suite of Creative Commons hereafter CC licences preferred by both funders of academic research and by many galleries, library, archives, and museums.
The chapter moves on to look at how applying these licences to academic publications may benefit both long-standing and emergent practices in the academe, concerns raised by the possibility of reuse under CC terms, and challenges that exist around implementation. After providing a critical discussion of why monographs are different, what they aim to do, and how they are made, Eve offers examples of OA monograph projects and potential economic models for OA monographs, including a call for scholars to not accept Book Processing Charges hereafter BPCs as a fait accompli and to engage in much needed experimentation with the form.
- Duplicate citations.
- ICEfaces 1.8: Next Generation Enterprise Web Development.
- Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies and the Future;
- About the author;
- Oh, Dem Golden Slippers.
- Journalism Ethics by Court Decree: The Supreme Court on the Proper Practice of Journalism.
Whilst keen to stress that the OA movement is about nothing more than achieving free and unrestricted access to academic publications, Eve argues — as indeed have many who champion OA — that the move to OA behoves the academic community to reflect on its publishing practices and to open up a space to rethink academic publishing, in particular peer review and how value is ascribed, gained, and transferred through scholarly communications.
In this vein, the chapter includes suggestions for how publication can be judiciously accelerated, for restoring the editor function through the post-publication collection and curation of articles, and for reforming peer review.
In, between, and straddling across these chapters are a combination of novel and distinctive arguments and observations, as well as established arguments repacked, reiterated, and reaffirmed. Together these elevate Open Access and the Humanities from a state-of-play summary to an important work of introspection and critical reflection.
Samenvatting If you work in a university, you are almost certain to have heard the term 'open access' in the past couple of years. You may also have heard either that it is the utopian answer to all the problems of research dissemination or perhaps that it marks the beginning of an apocalyptic new era of 'pay-to-say' publishing. In this book, Martin Paul Eve sets out the histories, contexts and controversies for open access, specifically in the humanities.
Be aware of your licensing options
Broaching practical elements alongside economic histories, open licensing, monographs and funder policies, this book is a must-read for both those new to ideas about open-access scholarly communications and those with an already keen interest in the latest developments for the humanities. Recensie s 'Eve's book gives a synoptic and multi-layered overview of many of the different factors at play in scholarly communication in the humanities, and offers valuable suggestions about how a transition to open access in the humanities might take better account of these factors, bringing much needed critical and constructive reflection to the contemporary pursuit of a long held dream.
It is essential reading for anyone interested in the future of open access and scholarly communication in the humanities, and a rallying call for more researchers to join those working to shape this future. Deep traditions of scholarly authority, reputation and vetting, relationships with publishers, etc. Still, there are new opportunities and definite signs of change. Among those at the forefront confronting these challenges while exploring open access opportunities for the humanities is Martin Paul Eve. Daught, oaopenaccess. I hope many of them will read it Throughout, Eve's examination of how the drive to OA intersects with strong academic, economic, political and cultural cross-currents is studded with insight.
He pulls apart the economics of publishing from the economics of academic prestige, questions the shifting perceptions of value of humanities scholarship situated within an increasingly marketised university system and a digital culture that demands greater transparency and engagement, and finds some common ground for humanities scholars and the authors of scientific research.